The recent donation of $250,000 from the Fish and Wildlife Foundation of Florida to the Vote Yes on Amendment 2 campaign has triggered backlash from local environmentalists. Chuck O’Neal, a prominent figure in wildlife conservation, expressed his dismay, believing that funds raised through wildlife conservation license plates should be used to protect animals, not promote hunting. The proposed amendment seeks to establish hunting and fishing as constitutional rights in Florida, which many, including O’Neal, fear could jeopardize wildlife protection efforts, particularly for species like the black bear. The Fish and Wildlife Foundation defended its actions, stating that the donation was sourced from general contributions and not from license plate sales. Despite raising $1.

8 million from license plate sales last year, the foundation insists that its primary mission aligns with wildlife conservation. The controversy highlights a growing divide between hunting advocates and conservationists in Florida, raising questions about the future of wildlife management policies. As the Vote Yes campaign continues to gain traction, the environmental community remains vigilant against potential threats to Florida's biodiversity. O’Neal's comments resonate with many who feel misled about the foundation's true intentions.