In a recent statement, Councilman Michael Cathcart expressed his firm opposition to House Bill 1339, which proposes moving municipal elections to coincide with state and federal races in even-numbered years. He articulated concerns that this legislative change would overshadow vital local issues, making it challenging for voters to engage with municipal governance effectively. According to Cathcart, merging local elections with high-profile national contests could lead to increased partisan interference, undermining the integrity of local decision-making. He emphasized the importance of allowing voters to focus on local leadership, arguing that local elections should not be diluted by the distractions of national political brawls. The Councilman's remarks align with broader concerns among local leaders about the potential consequences of legislative changes on the democratic process at the municipal level.

He points out that voters need adequate time and energy to research down-ballot issues, which would be compromised if municipal elections are held concurrently with larger state and federal races. Cathcart's statement serves as a rallying cry for those advocating for the preservation of local electoral integrity. The ongoing debate around HB 1339 highlights the critical need for local governance to remain distinct and prioritized in the electoral landscape.